For ye are all the
children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been
baptized into Christ have put on Christ..….for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
And if ye be Christ's, then are ye
Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
(Gal 3:26-29
KJV)
Some
centuries ago when the known world was ruled by royal empires, when there were
no air planes and when people’s wealth
was directly linked to the expanse of land they owned, giving birth to sons was
absolutely serious business, almost literarily. If you were rich and you had
not given birth to a son it was as if you didn’t have anything and for
practical purposes you didn’t because when you died there would be nobody to
perpetuate your name and your servants would most likely inherit your wealth.
That was why Abraham was so concerned when he hadn’t gotten a son and he
already concluded his chief servant was going to inherit all he had [check
Genesis chapter 15]. Sons, especially first sons, were the very epitome of the
glory of a family; they were supposed to exemplify the virtues, wealth and
character of the family. When you see the son you see all the family has to
offer.
Beyond that
however, in those times in history, as it is now, whether male or female child,
the quality of your life depends on the wealth of your parents. If your parents
are rich, other things being equal, you exhibited traits of wealth: you wear
more expensive clothes, go to better and more expensive schools, etcetera.
There are just some things you expect from a child from a rich family as
opposed to one from a poor background. These days, though the bias for and
attachment to sons is still visible, especially in African societies, females also
now effectively represent their families well. We now see both male and female
children taking over family business across the globe. The point I am trying to
make here is that as long as the world exist, children generally are expected
to reflect the wealth or otherwise of their parents.
With that
background let’s look at our lives as Christians. In the part of scripture
quoted above we see clearly that we are referred to and we actually are
children of God through Christ Jesus. In other words we are born of God, we are
his offspring. Romans chapter 8 vs 15-17 states that we have received the
spirit of adoption that makes God our father. Consequently, going by the same
analogy, it means that as children of God we should of necessity reflect the
glory [virtues, wealth and character] of God. When people interact with us they
should be able to know that God is our father. So if God is royalty, we are
royalty, if God is righteous then we are righteous, if God cannot be sick then
we have divine health, if God is not poor then we shouldn’t be poor. I believe you are catching my point.
The issue
of fatherhood or parenthood is very significant because whatever our father has
we have access to. All what he has is our inheritance by the simple fact that
we are born of him. If our experiences therefore do not reflect to whom we
belong, then there is a big problem. Now let’s juxtapose this with the
experiences we have as Christians and we will readily see that our lives many
times go contrary to the claim of who our father is. Both our character and the
quality of our lives greatly fall short of this truth many times, why is this
so? Chapter 4 vs 1-2 of Galatians tells
us why:
Now I
say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; But is under
tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.
(Gal 4:1-2 KJV)
Wow! What
this scripture is telling me is that I might be the child of my father but as
long as I remain a child and do not grow into a son, I am not different from a
servant. The bible says though this child is the lord of all [being the heir
and owner to all his father has], he would have the experience of a servant as
long as he remained a child because a child cannot TAKE ADVANTAGE of what he
has. This is the key to the reason why we have experiences that do not reflect the
image of our Father. As long as we remain a child we cannot adequately
appropriate the advantages we have in Christ. This scripture shows us that the
child would be under tutors and governors [that is, teachers] till appointed
time [till he grows to maturity].
At first
glance we might suppose that it is the father who has determined the appointed
but actually it is the child. This is because nobody but the child can
determine how fast he would grow to maturity. Consequently we are the only one
who can determine how fast we grow into maturity in Christ; whether we want to
remain a child or grow to become sons. The use of son in this discourse does
not refer male or female as we see in the opening scripture that there is
neither male nor female in Christ but to a state of maturity. Let us all strive
to grow into maturity in Christ so that we can BE ALL WE CAN BE, HAVE ALL WE
CAN HAVE and DO ALL WE CAN DO. So I put this question to you: Are you your
Father’s son?
No comments:
Post a Comment